Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

In its chargesheet, CBI had alleged that Ms. Kanimozhi and Kalaignar TV MD Sharad Kumar were part of a criminal conspiracy in which DB Realty paid a bribe of Rs 200 crore to Kalaignar TV in return for 2G telecom licences and spectrum during A Raja's tenure as telecom minister. Kalaignar TV, however, claimed that it was a legitimate loan taken on market rates to run the channel and they had returned the money with interest (approximately Rs 214 crore) - Is this easy to draw dry wool on the eyes of CBI ?

Tags: money, tv, ms
Asked by venkatesaldevarajan, 24 Jun '11 01:18 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (5)

 
1.

The proof against her is too strong.A person does not lend 200 crores without any security.Besides,there was no reason to route the loan through so many channels.Kani is trying to hide some thing.
Answered by Damodar Biswal, 24 Jun '11 01:30 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

The CBI itself will give answers to Raja and company,so that they get away scotfree.It is just a matter of time,where they all will be acquitted.
Answered by prabir sanyal, 24 Jun '11 01:52 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

If its true definitely there books will tell the correct story,which might be underscruitny of CBDT and cbi
Answered by sushil trivedi, 24 Jun '11 01:22 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

It may not be easy, but it is not impossible.
Answered by rajan, 24 Jun '11 01:21 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Yes as politicians they know the loopholes in the Income Tax Act had it not been for the supervision by the supreme court, the accounts would have been settled by now
Answered by rajnikant raiyarela, 24 Jun '11 01:20 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining