Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Why mulayam singh yadav. mayawati are given so many security guards and z class security while gen vk singh was removed, is it justified?

Tags: sports, yadav, news & events
Asked by Ramesh Agarwal, 27 Dec '12 08:34 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (15)

1.

No, its not justified at all as the general should get the due respect & the security for him which he well deserves after serving the armed forces his entire life. If he has been protesting against the government which is his right to voice his opinion that should not be taken against him by the government to remove his security. This is another shameful act of the UPA government!!
Answered by dharamender nebhnani, 28 Dec '12 11:13 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
 
2.

Giving security to any of the political leaders is not justified. IF they need security they should pay for it and make heir own arrangements. Providing security on tax payer's money is ridiculous in a country a country like ours.
Answered by Shyam, 28 Dec '12 11:47 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Yes, it's justified. Now give me the BA tag!
Answered by gaurav hooja, 27 Dec '12 08:38 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (3)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

I thought the guards were posted around them to prevent them from attacking the common man,.
Answered by Somebodysomewhere, 28 Dec '12 11:30 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Yes,all should be at par
Answered by anil garg, 01 Jan '13 11:32 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Not Justified.
Answered by anantharaman, 28 Dec '12 11:28 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

Most undignified.
Preamble has 'socialist' tag.Its sham.
Answered by vishwabandhubajpai, 28 Dec '12 11:03 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Wo log Neta hain aur ab V.K.Singh ek aam aadmi
Answered by babu rao, 27 Dec '12 09:02 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

He deserves that treatment Ashe is violating the dignity of the office he was holding.
Judges and ex-service ppl. should never degrade the dignity of the office they were holding what may come since both r very sensitive posts for integrity of the country. Once they accept the post, they hv to simply obey the code of conducts.
Answered by MAdhavan Avadhany, 27 Dec '12 09:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

Because Government of India and the 2 Ms know understand the need for high security well but the Retired General does not need that security ...:-)
Answered by soumyen sarkar, 27 Dec '12 08:52 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Next

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining