Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Kya Mahatma Gandhiji (Father of Nation) Key Besharam Hatyarey ki Entire Community Ko Terrorist Kahna Durust Hai ? Nahee ,To Entire Muslims Ko Atankwadi kahna jurm hai , Kyounke Har Community mey UnSocial Elements Hai
Yr Vote and voice of conscience pls.

Asked by abdul hameed khan, 18 May '08 07:59 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (9)

1.

Well i feel that such generalizations have never worked in any part of d world.we sud not blame d entire community for d misdeeds of some unsocial elements only.
But here you are citing a wrong example n it shows ur mis conception n ignorance about history.Terrorism n murder of Gandhi ji are two different issues.
Answered by prashant sharma, 18 May '08 08:03 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Except a few misdirect people I don't think anybody blamed any community this time for the Jaipur blasts.

I am from Rajasthan. Like the peace loving and brave people of Rajasthan let's not get excited about such things and not to incited by anyone...

Remember India has survived numerous invasion not because it has been invincible but due to its UNITED & knowledgeable people and diverse culture.
Answered by rajneesh Rediff, 18 May '08 08:15 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

This is why I miss Socialist Republic of India, the India I grew up in. Back then, we were more into making 20 Rupee trips to Mars, and dancing nude as large groups of ppls the beaches of Goa. Well, sure, not "moral" but we at least knew how 2 enjoy life in a democracy......instead of getting over "My God is good, yours is bad" arguments.

Those arguments are stupid, lead to nowhere, and that is EXACTLY what the terrorists want- for the ppls in the nation to be fractured.
Answered by A Moin, 18 May '08 08:04 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Rajneesh has well clarified and given matured answer for this.
Answered by jameel ahmed, 23 May '08 10:50 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Actually friend the problem is - Most of teh human community, i mean so called the common people are blind.

The state machinery of many countries using the terrorist formula to divert the mind of their people from real issues of life.

This working very well... whenever u see any problem inw orld, u will find some bombs going off... and then whole world, meadia start blaming on Muslims and forget the real issues of their lives.

That's the clever thing once Hitler did against the Jews and now same thing happening against Muslims.


just try to observe it minutelya nd you will find the link between Hitler's propaganda against Jews with New world's schemes against present day Muslims.

I dont say, there are no extremists among muslims, in fact I am ashamed of them, but taht doesnot mean ISLAM IS BEHIND ALL THE CRIMES... GOD BLESS US ALL...
Answered by Musaddiq Ameen, 19 May '08 10:58 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

After Bombay (Mumbai) train blasts , Hindu and Muslim youth jointly and zealously worked to help the wounded and to resore normalcy.
Answered by srinivas iragavarapu, 18 May '08 09:15 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

TERRORISM IS NOT A MUSLIM MONOPOLY
Times Of India Mumbai,Jul 23, 2006
SWAMINATHAN S ANKLESARIA AIYAR

''All Muslims may not be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.'' This comment , frequently heard after the Mumbai bomb blasts implies that terrorism is a Muslim specialty, if not a monopoly. The facts are very different.

First, there is nothing new about terrorism. In 1881, anarchists killed the Russian Tsar Alexander II and 21 bystanders. In 1901, anarchists killed US President McKinley as well as King Humbert I of Italy. World War I started in 1914 when anarchists killed Archduke Ferdinand of Austria. These terrorist attacks were not Muslim.

Terrorism is generally defined as the killing of civilians for political reasons. Going by this definition, the British Raj referred to Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad and many other Indian freedom fighters as terrorists. These were Hindu and Sikh rather than Muslim.

Guerrilla fighters from Mao Zedong to Ho Chi Minh and ...more
Answered by misconception, 19 May '08 12:01 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

EVERY COMMUNITY HAS ANTI SOCIAL ELEMENTS AND THEY FEED EACH OTHER . YOU HAVE SEEEN WHAT HAPPENED IN GUJARAT ALSO . SO YOU CAN NOT BLAME ANY COMMNITY
HITLER KILLED 6 MILLION JEWS ,CAN YOU BLAME CHRISTIANTY OR CHRISTIANS FOR THAT ------------------------NO NEVER
I THINK MEDIA IS STREOTYPING MUSLIMS AS TERRORISTS AND PEOPLE BUY IT .
99.99 % OF MUSLIMS OVER THE WORLD ARE PEACE LOVING AS ANY ONE BUT PEOPLE FORGET THIS 99.99% AND HIGHLIGHT 0.01% OF BAD MUSLIMS AS REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSLIM COMMUNITY .
THANKS
Answered by zakirbhai, 19 May '08 12:28 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

kisi ek kaum ko anthakwadi kehna teek nahi hai, lekin yeh be shocho ko sari duniya, sabse zyada anthankwadi kis kaum ke pakade gaye hai.
Answered by rajnikant raiyarela, 18 May '08 08:04 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

Politicians are still not unanimous on war against naxalism. People like Digvijay Singh, Lalu Yadav, Mamta Banerjee still playing politics and talking..more

Answered by Danendra Jain