Q.
Why mamta is not allowing uma bharti to organise and address public meetings on her campiagn of cleansing ganga mata?is it not fasticism?
Asked by Ramesh Agarwal,
24 Sep '12 08:45 pm
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (6)
1.
She is a pseudo secularist.Thinks of losing minority votes if supports Ganga mata.
Answered by Damodar Biswal, 24 Sep '12 08:49 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
UMA had a SAFFRON-smell, Communal touch & BJP inclinations.
Answered by Kanai Chakraberti, 24 Sep '12 08:48 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Ganga is a RIVER..........one of the most polluted one on earth... NOT a MOTHER.
Cleaning of Ganga is an environmental issue.....all these crocodile tears calling it mother and public meetings are a political farce to attract hindu sentimental Vote.
The India government and world bank have already initiated cleaning of Ganga. No agitation is needed now.
In fact HINDU organizations like GANGA SENA is opposing the Governments initiative saying that Ganga is not polluted, can not be polluted. Oh God...save these fools!
Answered by Shunmugham, 25 Sep '12 05:39 pm
Cleaning of Ganga is an environmental issue.....all these crocodile tears calling it mother and public meetings are a political farce to attract hindu sentimental Vote.
The India government and world bank have already initiated cleaning of Ganga. No agitation is needed now.
In fact HINDU organizations like GANGA SENA is opposing the Governments initiative saying that Ganga is not polluted, can not be polluted. Oh God...save these fools!
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
Yes it is...and most importantly....ladies cat war....
Answered by sanjay sharma, 24 Sep '12 08:52 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received