Q.
India and America are doing so much for other countries and the world,yet in the end,they get a bad name.other countries do not understand the great value of these two countries.we should stop helping them,then they will come to their senses.instead we should mind our own business.we should stop all help to them forthwith.these other countries are like parasites,making money out of Indians,we give them a lot of money,when we study abroad,etc.we have helped in every way possible.we should not waste our money and energy on them.what are your opinions?
Asked by neeti,
24 Jan '10 11:06 am
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (6)
1.
You are speaking a bitter truth; you are true when you say we should not waste ; that is right ; but that is not without any reason; when we help others we try to buy or beg of their favour when we are in distress;
these helps are diplomatically motivated.... helping pakistan had such motives;
america almost enslaves the nation it helps
Answered by Om Shrivastava, 29 Nov '12 03:08 pm
these helps are diplomatically motivated.... helping pakistan had such motives;
america almost enslaves the nation it helps
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
Comrad u need to review u r stance here please .
India are "doing so much" for other countries? For get oither countries, why not India's core allies first? Did u know Gemal Abdule Nasser of Egypt way a NAM CO-FOUNDER w/ India, our CORE ally, yet when he got attacked MASSIVELY by US and Isreal for nationalizing the Suez Canal which was his right (just as we nationalized a lot fo British assets after 47), and ALL we could muster was a bunch of sad poetry to the UN....
Compare that w/ China. When North Korea, their core bilateral ally- got attacked by the ENTIRE UN and the US, the Chinese took 1 million losses to repel the UN from DPR Korea and establish "no more fracking with us" reputation w/ UN independently of USSR.
Gemal Nasser of Egypt let go of a LUCRATIVE protectorate of Warsaw Pact when he sided w/ India and NAM. IF he had Soviet backing, NO WAY the US and ISrael would DARE step into his land. But he relied on us and we COMP-LETELY failed.
Like it or hate it , Sa ...more
Answered by A Moin, 16 Mar '10 09:51 pm
India are "doing so much" for other countries? For get oither countries, why not India's core allies first? Did u know Gemal Abdule Nasser of Egypt way a NAM CO-FOUNDER w/ India, our CORE ally, yet when he got attacked MASSIVELY by US and Isreal for nationalizing the Suez Canal which was his right (just as we nationalized a lot fo British assets after 47), and ALL we could muster was a bunch of sad poetry to the UN....
Compare that w/ China. When North Korea, their core bilateral ally- got attacked by the ENTIRE UN and the US, the Chinese took 1 million losses to repel the UN from DPR Korea and establish "no more fracking with us" reputation w/ UN independently of USSR.
Gemal Nasser of Egypt let go of a LUCRATIVE protectorate of Warsaw Pact when he sided w/ India and NAM. IF he had Soviet backing, NO WAY the US and ISrael would DARE step into his land. But he relied on us and we COMP-LETELY failed.
Like it or hate it , Sa ...more
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Mam there is a difference when Americsans are helping countries which are under dictators indirectly helping Americas Arms merchant or Death merchants
when India helps any country credit or material friendship plus trade and commerce ok
Nepal is case study bangladesh classic case of No Gratitude that's all
Answered by pramod gokhale, 24 Jan '10 12:21 pm
when India helps any country credit or material friendship plus trade and commerce ok
Nepal is case study bangladesh classic case of No Gratitude that's all
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
Yes you are right neethi, but again in the world we cannot change certain policies
Answered by rajni, 24 Jan '10 11:07 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received