Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

What could be the possible fall out of Bombay high court's decision to acquit Sabahuddin and Fahim Ansari, who, according to the police were the men who conducted a survey for the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. Your views?

Tags: bombay, relationships, politics & government
Asked by Good Citizen, 21 Feb '11 03:17 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (3)

 
1.

No substantial evidence, insufficient proofs and benefit of doubt is given to both. Police could not establish any solid links between them and the real culprits, based on weak supporting documents court could do nothing but acquit them.
Answered by Mohammed asim nehal, 21 Feb '11 03:22 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Two Indian nationals, alleged to be co-accomplices in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, have been acquitted by the Bombay High Court which upheld the death sentence to Pakistani terrorist Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab has acquitted them for lack of evidence upholding trail courts verdict .As per law the accused gets benefit of doubt and it is for the prosecution to prove the case to the hilt .
Answered by venkatesaldevarajan, 21 Feb '11 03:44 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Minority politics. congress must have pressurised to get the stmpathy from their vote bank........
so sad... :((
Answered by Abdul, 21 Feb '11 03:20 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.