Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Should the PRESIDENT OF INDIA & PMO have the CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to procrastinate and make delays for the pending 'HANG ORDER CASES' ??
AND, why not the execution-cases are performed
in open places ?
HUMAN RIGHTS nuisances ??

Tags: politics & government
Asked by Kanai Chakraberti, 02 Jan '11 06:50 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (6)

1.

If the criminal happens to be a muslim, then the PMO as well as the President of the Republic has the 'right ' to procrastinate and ask the bureaucrats to keep the file at a place where it cannot be easily traced. If he happens to be an islamic terrorist, chances are that even though he has been sentenced to death by the highest court in the land, he will serve out a life sentence and be released at the expiry of a term of 15 years on the flimsiest of pretexts and then the same islamic criminal will indulge in his "holy" duty of killing us, kafirs. Of course, islam being a religion of 'peace', does not permit all these things, but who is to tell this to the likes of Riyaz Bhatkal, Fahim Ansari and the rest of the killers ? And who is to persuade these highest office-bearers of the suicidal nature of their procrastination ? Let us silently and without complaining, continue to suffer these rogues for as long as we can !
Answered by Jaisingh Thakur, 02 Jan '11 06:58 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

I feel that the PM & President of Indis should have the power of accepting od denying a mercy petitionof a criminal sentenced to death but there should be explicit and exceptional reasons for accepting the mercy petition and such reasons should also be made public.Also there should be a ficed time limit in which they have to take a decision, otherwise the sentence may be carried out.
I do not agree that the sentence should be carried out in an open place.
Answered by HEMANT MEHTA, 02 Jan '11 06:56 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

No
no
Answered by anil garg, 29 Jul '13 12:38 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

They should not.But our constitution has given them power to do so.Politicalisation makes all the difference.
Answered by Damodar Biswal, 02 Jan '11 07:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Till Political parties are anticipating Votes from Minorities and Talking about so called Secularism etc etc, we just cant imagine this
President is nothing but selected by those Leaders
So The President wont take any decision against what rulers like and think
PMO becomes Power centre's Official office now a days
After looooooong years, our Respected PM has taken only one decison
That is, He is ready to face the enquiry of PAC.
EVEN Congress high command didnt expect this
Answered by hitler, 02 Jan '11 07:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Democracy never permits serious actions on serious punishments....!!!
Answered by anantharaman, 02 Jan '11 06:54 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.