Q.
Shouldn't there be President's Rule in Jharkhand ?
Asked by dev kapoor,
26 May '10 01:28 pm
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (4)
1.
Politics of Sibu Soren (and his team members), the unfortunate Chief Minister of Unfortunate state Jharkhand has always been to remain in power somehow or the other. He has contributed noting for tribals in fact. He has done nothing for the state whenever he was in power at state level or at central level .He and his gang men always made efforts to accumulate wealth by extorting money from businessmen, demanding money by vehicles owner passing on the road, or forcefully collecting money from people in service using musclemen of his party. Not only Sibu Soren , even other Chief Ministers and ministers who headed Jharkhand before him and other so called leaders of tribal people of Jharkhand are simply misusing tribal sentiments for personal gains. Leaders of Jharkhand mostly indulged in caste politics and almost ignored welfare steps desired to be taken by them as promised by them during election rallies and in their election manifestos.
Otherwise a rich state like Jharkhand after ...more
Answered by Danendra Jain, 31 May '10 06:39 am
Otherwise a rich state like Jharkhand after ...more
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
Yes -agreed with your comments ,but sibu saran have some links with congress ,hence not possible
Answered by Pardeep kapoor, 26 May '10 01:31 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Yes oterwise congress will buy mlas to form govtvas in case of koda.
Answered by Ramesh Agarwal, 26 May '10 01:30 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received