Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

When pakistan is always attacking india on the issue of kashmir ??? and they always talk about some agreement at the time of partition ,Is it not necessary for all of us indians to know about what is that agreement and what was the decision ???

Tags: sports, agreement, news & events
Asked by hp daml, 16 Mar '13 11:21 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (11)

1.

Almost every one know that fact in India that Kashmir is an integral part of India
Answered by iqbal seth, 17 Mar '13 06:27 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

No agreement. Many Indian states acceded to the Union of India under the persuasion of Sardar Vallabbhai Patel. The Prince of Kashmir also acceded to India. However, Pakistant sent militants to Kashmir. The issue should have been resolved by India under the leadership of Patel, but Nehru referred the matter to UNO. The UN resolved that there should be plebiscite in Kashmir but before that Pakistan should vacate tjhe aggression committed by it. Pakistan has not vacated the aggression. India claims that we have held democratic elections many times and this is more than a plebicite. Now the UN has left it to India and Pakistan to bilaterally solve the issue.
Answered by mandook, 19 Mar '13 08:56 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Pakistan leaders are not faithful to their country
No good expections
Answered by yusuf syed, 17 Mar '13 09:33 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Yes you are right, friend
Answered by rajnikant raiyarela, 17 Mar '13 07:22 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Yes
Answered by Quest, 17 Mar '13 11:39 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Now no more talks and no more entertainment for them and cut all relationships so that they die their own death
Answered by babu rao, 17 Mar '13 10:34 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

Let Pakistan understand and follow that deceision.
Answered by Om Shrivastava, 17 Mar '13 05:00 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

That;s right.

Not only the India-Pak Partition Agreement but its shameful to remind that in post independence war with China we lost great patch of land to China in 1961 war in Arunachal Region. And our the then PM said that "Not Even a Blade of Grass Grow Over There..."
Answered by Ramchander kumar kushwaha, 17 Mar '13 01:01 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

All this comes under Indian Independence Act 1947. Just Google it and you will get all such information.
It was under this Act that Pakistan was created and the Maharaja of the princely state of J & K opted to join the Indian union. Once he signed the instrument of accession, J & K became legally part of the Indian territory. It is as legal as the creation of Pakistan
Answered by Vikram, 17 Mar '13 12:59 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

There was NO agreement between India and Pakistan about Kashmir, at the time of partition. It so happened that when Pakistan attacked Kashmir in 1947 and took a substantial portion of the territory ( called POK Pakistan Occupied Kashmir by India and Azad Kashmir by Pakistan), Nehru went to UNO with the matter. A ceasefire was hurriedly brought about (LoC) and UNO Arbitrated in favour of a PLEBISCITE. In that, there should be a free and fare election through which the people of Kashmir would decide where they want to go:
1) India.
2) Pakistan.
3) Opt for a free nation.
Nehru was horrified with UNO's judgement , as Kashmir being 95% Muslim populated region, it was clear that in a PLEBISCITE, they may opt either for merging with Pakistan or opt for a free country. Very little possibility was seen in Kashmiris opting to remain part of India.
Therefore India rejected this resolution of UNO. On the other hand, Pakistan continuously insists on the implementation of UNO's resolution o ...more
Answered by QueSera Sera, 17 Mar '13 12:14 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Next

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining