Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

While discussing highly sensitive hypothetical scenarios like the use of weapons of mass distribution do you think that the conclusions that are drawn upon such discussions and the predictions that are made on these bases are realistic. Don't they traumatize or just lead to unrealistic positive expectations?

Asked by Rohit Soni, 10 Jun '09 03:50 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (3)

 
1.

We have witnessed all too often super power during summit agreed to destroy some of their weaponry and they did. To the world it appears that with the destruction of these weapon the threat to the world due to presence of these weapons have been reduced. The truth is not as it is projected to the world. The destroy the weapons which are rendered redundant due to invention and introduction of new far advanced and more deadlier weapons. The world is now under greater threat than before.
Answered by Jack Johnson, 10 Jun '09 10:25 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Good question , those who have used weapons of mass destruction like atom bombs are the one\'s who are moral police teaching the world what is right or wrong , any one who uses even a small bomb is a terrorists since these people manufacturing weapons of mass destruction are the one\'s having rights for using bombs or whatever ,these guys control the media and label their inhuman acts as right and in interest of humanity and those who oppose them are bad and terrorists ,the world is molded in this thinking right now
Answered by mythsbusted, 11 Jun '09 02:11 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

U are right to an extent.sensationalisation of some hypothetical data may create unwarranted panic in the minds of masses, but at the same times sometimes hypothetical scenarios , may force people to think and reverse trends. pollution, global warming and such positive issues are influenced with such projections!!
Answered by vaani, 10 Jun '09 03:53 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.