Q.
When inadvertence has become excusable for politicians and ministers or public servants with in the four corners of jurisprudence , why same innocuous inadvertence could not be extended for a train driver or an air pilot ?
Asked by venkatesaldevarajan,
05 Feb '12 03:15 pm
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (3)
1.
Because they r not the law makers.In our country the law is equal for all but some people r more equal than others.The politicians come under the second category.
View Map
View Map
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
Inadvertence stems from a lack of attentiveness, inattention, or fault from negligence. However, mere inadvertence does not warrant relief unless, on consideration of all the evidence, the inadvertence is excusable. Forgetting about the case or mislaying the summons and complaint are not sufficient grounds for relief. Inadvertence is often combined with excusable neglect.
Answered by jameel ahmed, 05 Feb '12 03:20 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received