The Supreme Court recently ruled that the right to live-in with a partner, without the certificate of marriage, was a fundamental right. In such a case will you be happy to have a live-in relationship?? Well some feel a live-in before marriage is better for she/he feels that there are less chances of a break-up of the marriage, post a live-in. Also they believe who have a live-in are more responsible about commitment, And when u know beforehand that you are compatible with the person and then take d plunge into marriage. Its easier and better. Well wat's your view??
Answers (8)
Comrade Irani, sociologically speaking there are two ways to go. Family centric societies and then indi centric societies. THe family centric society will not accept live in relationship, but then it will be possible for a 19 year old boy to marry a 17 year old girl and start a family w/a flat a job a college free access, wife gets housewife subsidy if she wishes, or same facilities as boy...
That is called the PYONGYANG way.
Then there is the SEOUL way. WHich is the path India has taken.....thus, there's more money 2 b made but life MUCH costlier to a point that u cannot afford to support a family of 4 till u r in the 30s many times. And even once careers get settled, modern life requires you to travel a lot, spend a LOT of hours on overt ...more
What if a couple is caught in a compromising position in a lodge in a police raid, will the police forgive them if they tell that they are live in partners?
Our sentiments too are also biased at the behest of media trumpets.