Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

There are several places in vedas, upanishadas and puranas where prophet muhammad(p.b.u.h) is mentioned. One of them is Allopanishad 1,2,3(upanishad) where the prophet(p.b.u.h) is mentioned by the name. Isn't that mean prophet muhammad is final messenger(kalki avatar) of Allah. Or Is that mean all these sacred scripture has been corrupted?

Asked by Hilyas, 25 Apr '10 02:58 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (10)

1.

There are two things common fortunately in all scriptures
1 == god is one without image or body negating divinity to man like jesus buddha or any one
2= prophet mohammad is prophecised in all scriptures as last and final massenger in all major scriptures . it is amazing and even now people can reach the truth from any scriptures . to be a good hindu people have to accept mohammad pbuh as last and final massenger .similalry for chrisitans nad jews and parsees and budhist also .prophet mohammad brought truth in a form never to be lost again in form of quran and attesting the truth that came earlier but got corrupted due to human meddling or due to lack of technology to preserve scriptures
Answered by fakeastrologer, 26 Apr '10 11:11 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

People don't have time to read & search the truth.Even in the old testment.of Bible(Ingeel) had written about last Prophet.
The noble Quran says:-(2:213) In the beginning all the people followed the same way. (Afterwards there came a change and differences arose). Then Allah sent Prophets to give good tidings to those who followed the Right Way and warnings to those who swerved from it. And He sent down with them the Book based on the Truth so that it should judge between the people concerning their differences. (Differences arose not because people were not given the knowledge of the Truth in the beginning, nay), differences arose between those very people who had been given clear teachings, and (for no other reasons than that) they wanted to tyrannize over one another.230 So Allah, by His leave, guided those who believed in the Prophets to the Truth about which they had differed; AIIah guides whomever He pleases to the Right Way.
Expalanation*230. When ignorant people attempt to ...more
Answered by yusuf syed, 25 Apr '10 03:20 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Graet analogy
Answered by conviction, 25 Apr '10 03:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Your assumptions are absurd to say the least.
Answered by HEMANT MEHTA, 25 Apr '10 03:01 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

It is possible islam is from the devil, because Md did not know who God is and who the devil is. Jesus provides salvation for all who come to Him. neither Md nor quran is needed for mankind.
Answered by straight path, 03 Apr '12 09:47 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

I love and respect all religions.I've visited, CHURCH, MOSQUES, nd other SACRED PLACES.Now as per HINDUISM, the ten avataras are those of LORD VISHNU, the avataras are - --- LORD RAM, KRISHNA, THE LAST IS ' KALKI '.The world famous man who saw tommorow - NOSSTRADAMUS,
has predicted that KALKI AVATARA, will born in SOUTHERN RANGE OF INDIA,it Ithink is konkan area..
As per HOLY QURAN, PROPHET MUHAMMAD, is the last messanger of ALLAH.But HE is not considered as KALKI AVATAR.
As far as scripture are concerened,the ORIGINAL are to be referred, as translations may not be hundred percent correct.
If we call WATER as - WATER, PANI, NEER, JAL, H2O, THE WATER REMAINS AS WATER, its not that the property of water changes, simillarly, GOD called by any name do not changesIn all major religions
of world GOD is witout any qualities, and form.
I have no intention of hurting any one or any religion, i have just stated the facts which please note.Thanks.
Answered by harshendu madge, 27 Apr '10 06:16 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

None of the scriptures should be taken as final word.The human knowledge is growing with evolving generations.The wisdom must improve with time.
Answered by Ramsingh Sachan, 27 Apr '10 12:51 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Allopnishad ? Does that grant credit to Allah or to the Upnishadic -lore of this land ? Strange thinking.Absolute currupt thoughts to hammer secular-type of propogtion to loo-down traditionally high and admirable Philosphy of life .No reference by the term of Allah is found in Vedas,upnishads or purans.Dara Shikoh made the honest attemp to bring the Islamic thoughts close to Vedic culture by acceptong high value attached to the word 'oam' when he startesd the commentry of quran with opening words "Oam-ul-Quran",and he was negotiated no-body knows how,but courtsey fanatics and fatwas.
Answered by vishwabandhubajpai, 25 Apr '10 05:16 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

So the upanishas r correct .what do u say.
Answered by Haalayudha Dattuni, 25 Apr '10 04:27 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

Whatever is mentioned in one traditional Indian scrpiture, is generally reflected in other scriptures also. But not a single learned preacher, of traditional Indian faith, has ever mentioned this. Nor have I ever come across this anywhere myself. This indicates that your second presumption is correct or someone has given you wrong information.
Logically also it is not possible because Kalki avtar is supposed to be rebirth of Lord Krishna. He has promised that whenever there is downfall of righteousness and uprising of evil He takes birth. But the teachings of your Prophet (p.b.u.h.) seem to indicate a total disapproval of teachings of Shree Krishna and the traditional Indian faith.
Answered by Vikram, 25 Apr '10 03:35 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

"Saint" is the English word often used to refer to a wali, pl. awliya', which literally means a friend, i.e. a friend of Allah.Imam al-Qushayri define..more

Answered by muslimah