Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Three Indian batsmen were given out LBW. Any dissent reaction from the Indian players?

Asked by Good Citizen, 28 Jul '10 02:44 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (5)

 
1.

I only saw Laxman's disimissal and there was no reaction of dissent. Also, the decisions seem to be pretty straight foward , juding by commentary from cricinfo (which has very gracefully been reproduced by Musfer)
Answered by RAJAN MHAMAI, 28 Jul '10 07:05 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Hi , There were no Mistakes from Darryl Harper and RJ Tucker (Umpires) , Srilankan Bowlers Googly Trapping Indian Batsmen , Murali Vijay wickets Mendis Done in by the googly!

In the case of Dravid, Suraj Randiv taken a bow! Dravid had been looking a touch edgy today and he was gone . It spun in quickly from outside off, Dravid went back and was surprised by the pace off the pitch. And he tried to get the bat down in a hurry but ended up wafting it across the line and all around it. Gone! Trapped in front!

Laxman LBW - Another magic from Mendiz , This also Done in by the googly . It broke back in around the middle stump line, Laxman was a touch late in getting forward and pushed slightly outside the line and was hit on the pad. It would have hit the leg stump.
Answered by Musfer, 28 Jul '10 02:58 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (3)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

I think no controversial decision.
Answered by Dare Devil, 28 Jul '10 07:32 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Dissent is so crucial to American democracy that its spirit was written into the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. After assuring citizens of certain other freedoms, such as the "free exercise" of religion and "freedom of speech, or of the press," the founding fathers were very explicit about "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

You may define dissent in many different ways, often depending on whether it occurs in war or peace, but its essence has always been clear: People in a democracy
SOME TIMES THE OPPOSITE TEAM PLAYS NOT WITH 11 PLAYERS BUT WITH 13 INCLUDING UMPIRES
Answered by jameel ahmed, 28 Jul '10 03:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Acceptable :P
Answered by conviction, 28 Jul '10 02:44 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

THE SOUTH AFRCAN captain smith was out caught behind, but was ruled not out, the england team asked the decision of the onfield umpires be referedto ..more