New Zealand 26 v England Auckland 25 Mar 1955
South Africa 30 v England Port Elizabeth 13 Feb 1896
South Africa 30 v England Birmingham 14 Jun 1924
South Africa 35 v England Cape Town 1 Apr 1899
South Africa 36 v Australia Melbourne 12 Feb 1932
Australia 36 23. v England Birmingham 29 May 1902
New Zealand 42 v Australia Wellington 29 Mar 1946
Australia 42 v England Sydney 10 Feb 1888
India 42 v England Lord's 20 Jun 1974
South Africa 43 v England Cape Town 25 Mar 1889
Australia 44 v England The Oval 10 Aug 1896
South Africa 45 31.3 1.42 3 v Australia Melbourne 12 Feb 1932
England 45 35.3x4 1.88 1 v Australia Sydney 28 Jan 1887
England 46 19.1 2.40 4 v West Indies Port of Spain 25 Mar 1994
New Zealand 47 32.3 1.44 2 v England Lord's 19 Jun 1958
South Africa 47 47.1x4 1.49 2 v England Cape Town 25 Mar 1889
West Indies 47 25.3 1.84 3 v England Kingston 11 Mar 2004
West Indies 51 19.1 2.66 4 v Australia Port of Spain 5 Mar 1999
England 52 42.1 1.23 1 v ...more

0 if all get out on 0

New Zealand's 26 in 1954-55 is the only instance of this happening in a completed (all-out) innings. But there have been two other notable innings* where the runs scored lagged behind the overs bowled. In the final Test at The Oval in 1956, Australia limped to 27 for 5 in their second innings, in 38.1 overs. That was less than a year after arguably the most boring innings in Test history, when New Zealand crawled to 69 for 6 in 90 overs (0.76 runs per over) to force a draw against Pakistan at Dacca in 1955-56: slow left-armer Shujauddin had bowling figures of 9-8-1-0.

I think it is 27. New Zealand were shot out for that paltry score by Australia. I don't remember the year, sorry.

I know about India. It was 42 all out in England.

75

Get it from the web

I think it was the Windies who scored 49 runs.