Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

DO U AGREE........................that defination of secullerarisom must change.........because todays defination is if u blame to b j p or any hindu community...u r seculler.......is it correct defination?..........why hindusthani muslims do not realised that they are being fool by cong. & psudo-seculler partys?

Asked by Prashant Lanjewar, 26 Sep '08 02:47 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (5)

1.

Off course secularism in our country meant for hindus bjp or those who suuport them. as hindu u don't have any rights they are meant for minorities especially for muslim and christians. the muslim won't understand that they have become pawn in the hands of congres or any psuco-secular be it lalu or left
Answered by PRATIK KAMAT, 26 Sep '08 05:45 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

No i do not agree with you at all. Have you ever thought why would ppl call BJP etc a communal party, well at first instance there was no India that existed when all mughals and other invaders arrived here. then it was british that brought entire country under one umbrella, otherwise we would have been a no nation just may be some loose union fighting with each other. The indian was made up of all castes, cultures etc. BJP first roused that sentiment with the babri scandal, the entire pooh paah of making Ram Mandir was a ploy to generate votes in the name of the GOD. They got them too but if they were so concerned about the ram nadir and so touched by this feeling of a common Hindu then why was ram mandir not constructed for all those years BJP ruled. Why didn't they opted out of a coalition that asked them to drop ram Mandir and 386 if they want to form a govt. Why didn't thye told ppl that they will better sit in opposition and wait for full majority so that they can do what they p ...more
Answered by Nitin Dutt, 26 Sep '08 03:13 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Aapke jazbe ki kadar kartaa hoon. Kaash sabhi aapki trah sochte to kitna achha hota mera Bharat ?
Answered by munish dhingra, 26 Sep '08 02:53 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Absolutely
Answered by srinivas satyanarayan, 26 Sep '08 02:51 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

As far as BJP is concerned, there is no need to change definition of secularism. Nobody from BJP party or their family mebners has ever died in kar-seva(rath yatra) or ethnic violence. Other parties (which ever it may be) at least are not encouraging ethnic violence.
Answered by Raj Thakre, 26 Sep '08 02:51 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining