Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

DMK- Giiving suport from Outside to UPA. Why bargaining failed? sad in Politics, Dynasty rule to be banned.

Asked by hitler, 21 May '09 07:50 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (10)

1.

Congress has fixed up a formula: for ever 9 MPs one ministry. Like for ever 22 shares of RPL, you will get one RIL share. That was the formula. Therefore DMK was offered with 2 Cabinet ministers. DMK would have accepted this terms if Dayanithi and TR Baalu were lost in the election. Now thre are three in the family and one senior in the lokshabha. One vadai should be shared between the two.
Answered by Kovai King, 22 May '09 12:09 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Was hoping against hope all would be smooth this time around, but here is no end to greed.
Answered by rani suri, 21 May '09 07:55 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Begining of another \'chapter\' for power hungry and greedy owner
Answered by AMEER JAWAN, 21 May '09 07:54 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Now congress has enough seats by itself to form govt so blackmailing is not possible.
Answered by hotchips, 21 May '09 07:52 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

DMK wanted more minstry for his family
Answered by Friend, 21 May '09 07:51 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

There should be some limit for bargaining also, his demand is seven berths of which three to his family, he should have demanded that four also to his family members. to prove dynasty rule in TN.
Answered by bhaskar erram, 21 May '09 10:55 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

Friend,
supporter of upa mayawati, mulayam,lalu are helpless and can\'t bargain, they are entangled in cases against them.sharad pawar
is also not in position of bargaining. dmk and mamta will take benefit of this
Answered by RAM PARTAP AGGARWAL, 21 May '09 10:05 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

It is sad for modern politics that even pre-poll alliances are involved in such hard bargaining for power which shows dmk wants best ministries to get money for party and elections.dynasty rule can not be banned as rahul gandhi will be next pm.
Answered by Ramesh Agarwal, 21 May '09 09:26 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

This is all part and parcel of drama another form god daud
Answered by Dinesh C S, 21 May '09 08:49 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

DMK wanted to start a dynasty rule too !!
Answered by nargis bhambi, 22 May '09 12:36 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

Yes not only Baalu but also Raja and azhagiri not to be given any berth..more

Answered by hitler