Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Barack Obama went to d Taj Hotel, where two years before, Pakistani terrorist, took d whole city of Mumbai to ransom. They killed more than 200 people in d hotels, in CST station n on d roads of Mumbai. He presented a single white rose 2 d memorial of those killed in Taj hotel n wrote a note in d visitors' book. He said he is honored to be in India. He offered condolences to d killed tourists, including d Israeli couple, leaving their child an orphan. But he never uttered a word about who was responsible for these things. Comments plz.

Tags: mumbai, hotel, india
Asked by christina, 09 Nov '10 08:47 am
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (8)

1.

He was simply being diplomatic...Obama is one of the most intelligent and well read US president, he'd come well prepared...Every one knows that US adopts a double policy . If US really wants to help us, they shud simply stop providing military support to Pakistan.
Answered by beena john, 09 Nov '10 08:57 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
 
2.

The whole nation asking the same question! Why not he name the main culprit, Pakistan as epicenter of all such terrorist activities? What interest has he got in hiding Pak's name? President Obama has disappointed Indians by refusing to label Pakistan as a country harboring terrorists. To the contrary he expressed his understanding of why Pakistan has been slow in ending militancy. He has decided to shower billions of dollars in additional aid on Pakistan without even defining benchmarks for judging progress. Worse yet, the Obama administration has neither acknowledged Pakistans role in staging terrorist strikes in India nor made the slightest effort to help bring the Pakistan-based planners of the unparalleled Mumbai attacks to justice. In other words, when Washington refuses to even recognize the problem, can New Delhi really expect the US to be of any help? In fact, Washington is doing is making light of Indian concerns vis--vis Pakistan by asking New Delhi to adopt a flexible appro ...more
Answered by sumati gayki, 09 Nov '10 08:53 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

It hapens
they can not speak even when they wish to
Answered by anil garg, 14 Feb '12 11:53 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Whole nation has demanded him to extradicate David coleman headley to find out all truths behind 26/11 .
Answered by ignoreme, 20 Nov '10 01:13 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

See the site.................
http://hotels.ebest.in/chennai/default.html
Answered by ebest, 10 Nov '10 05:52 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

In joint session of parliament he mentioned that and wanted culprits to be brought to book
Answered by saranathan Narasimhan, 09 Nov '10 03:30 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

Have u heard "Silence Speaks" ?
Answered by Thomas, 09 Nov '10 09:13 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Political compulsions
Answered by dhanendra kumar jain, 09 Nov '10 09:08 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

I feel for the Pandith community there, but they are not the only sufferers of the land. Folk like Tribals have it much worse where Govt not only FORC..more

Answered by A Moin