Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Infact there were more Terror attack during BJP Rule like Kandhar, Akshardham, Red fort, Parliment attack and many more, then why Advani being Dy-PM & Home minister didnt attack Pakistan?

Asked by babu paate, 11 Apr '09 05:39 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (4)

1.

If u r talking about BJP then i must give u the longer & endless list of terrorist attacks in UPA tenure
mumbai train blasts, delhi bus blasts, rajasthan, banglore (twise attacks), hyderabad, kashmir, ahmedabad, lucknow crpf camp, delhi recent attack, assam (more than twise), mumbai (recent attacks) and many more which is endless

well i want to inform u that
akshardham attackers were killed in almost 24 hrs & i remember that NSG reached there immediately in night to carry operation whereas in mumbai it was delayed & took furstrating so many hrs & reached the next day.

whereas the parliament attackers were succesfult killed & terrorist were unable to even enter it
u wuld be also knowing the mastermind of that attack was also captured & now UPA govt is playing politics with him to capture muslim vote. This is realy ridiculus

Why u dont look at the thing that in NDA's govt the cease fire was done & now in Cong govt it has been broked frm last few months. U wuld have seen, & re ...more
Answered by Nirav Gala, 11 Apr '09 08:22 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Because, people like Mr. Advani & like-minded politicians came to lime light by capitalizing unrests among different communities. They had never made any attempt to solve real problems of the mass and took advantage of political chaos at different times. Now, due such reasons lying behind their growth, they remain afraid of losing their position to the public which they gained by playing divisive politics since after the death of Mahatma Gandhi. They occasionally instigate communality between hindus and muslims, between christians and hindus, between biharis and marathis so that their position in the society as politicians are not ignored and forgotten by the mass. Besides these activities, they themselves know it very well that everything else is impossible for them.
Answered by Sweet Tamarind, 11 Apr '09 06:54 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

We may not know the situation totallly
and one cannot go about attacking a nation ,when international law is to be abided
Answered by anil garg, 02 Oct '09 11:14 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Commandos successfully kill terrorists in akshardham.afzal is convicted in parliament attack.150 lives saved in kandahar.why dont you realise that saving lives of innocents were more imp.had rahul been in the plane in kandahar would not he been saved.how can saving 150 lives be an issue.how can you say that.if you are your family were in that flight would you have supported rahil gandhi who says passengers shd have been killed.what leader he is.why does he move around with nsg guards why is his life so imp and why only ordinary civilians were being made scapegoats.
Answered by advaita, 11 Apr '09 09:11 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining