Q.
Do you think the Pakistans claim that India is promoting terrorism in this region will get international approval?
Asked by Good Citizen,
10 Nov '09 11:28 am
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (9)
1.
No i dont think so that they would ever succeed in doing so as its only to conceal there own deeds that they do so & the world knows it very well !!
Answered by dharamender nebhnani, 10 Nov '09 10:19 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Well....Akbar Bugti (a Balochistani separatist leader operating in Pakistan) WAS.....India's poster boy, no denying of that. The reception he got while he was still alive (gunned by Pak Army) in India by govt makes me believe we sent more than a few Gandhiji CDs & some dhotis Bugti's way.
Also earlier on in history INDIA VERY MUCH SO sponsored terrorism in Pak w/ KGB's help. Some confessors of GEneral Lebed claim that the aircraft which Zia Ul Haq flew in was sabotauged by Indian RAW who got logistical help / fake Sri Lankan passports etc., arranged by the KGB.
This is geopolitics my comrade....just that after Bugti's and KGB's death we ARE NOT ABLE TO BE AS ACTIVE IN PAK AS BEFORE, but the intent is very much there. We made several pitches to ppl like Ahamed Shah Massud, Rashid Dotsum etc., who are very much anti Pak. INdia was one of the key powers which armed Massud's faction after the fall of the Communist govt in Afghanistan.
Pak won't get international support because ...more
Answered by A Moin, 10 Nov '09 09:32 pm
Also earlier on in history INDIA VERY MUCH SO sponsored terrorism in Pak w/ KGB's help. Some confessors of GEneral Lebed claim that the aircraft which Zia Ul Haq flew in was sabotauged by Indian RAW who got logistical help / fake Sri Lankan passports etc., arranged by the KGB.
This is geopolitics my comrade....just that after Bugti's and KGB's death we ARE NOT ABLE TO BE AS ACTIVE IN PAK AS BEFORE, but the intent is very much there. We made several pitches to ppl like Ahamed Shah Massud, Rashid Dotsum etc., who are very much anti Pak. INdia was one of the key powers which armed Massud's faction after the fall of the Communist govt in Afghanistan.
Pak won't get international support because ...more
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
For Pak. Intrnl means USA & China.Pak has agathered lots of experience in blackmailing .Believe us,give us or else.....(OIC is daal roti for them)
Answered by Subhas Mitra, 10 Nov '09 04:03 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
Pakistan`s credibility is at its lowest in international..........Nobody believes what they say.
Answered by kishore malhotra, 10 Nov '09 11:46 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.
A thief always remains a thief.All the global countries including China knows that Pakistan is behind all terrorist activities.To divert domestic political pressure,they r blaming us.
Answered by Damodar Biswal, 10 Nov '09 11:37 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.
WAR of word will never help. You have to be strong enough with rogue countries like CHINA & PAKISTHAN.
Make a policical/economical axis with JAPAN, USA & RUSSIA to deal with the problems.
Answered by Kanai Chakraberti, 10 Nov '09 11:34 am
Make a policical/economical axis with JAPAN, USA & RUSSIA to deal with the problems.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.
It depends totally on the country policies and friends and followers of the Pakistan at International level all knows the status of the Pakistan and their policies so their is no need of propogating such things
Answered by Anis Patel, 10 Nov '09 11:31 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received