Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

The headlines of an article in the most prominent newspaper of India (TOI of today) says - "Intel agencies ignored Hindu terror clues to probe jihad". Then it goes on to say that "Convinced that Islamic terrorists were responsible for major acts of terror, investigators ignored leads or possible lines of investigation into incidents like blasts at Malegaon, Mecca Masjid, Samjhauta Express and Ajmer".
Question- What is the difference between the two terrors which are mentioned in this report (Hindu terror and Islamic terror)?

Tags: question, india, hindu
Asked by Vikram, 09 Jan '11 10:04 am
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (3)

1.

One is action; Other one is reaction !
Answered by Shashi LS, 09 Jan '11 10:15 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

A cornered cat fights back. in the name of secularism the govt. systematically ignored the value systems of the hindus while pampering the minorities for votes and thus coming to and staying in power. no one expected this kind of reaction because violence in this form was never known to hindus. world wide we know which particular community breeds terrorists. we know which community does not and in fact till date has never learnt to accept community with different faiths than their own. the question to be asked is why is not the so called hindu terror found in other countries and why only in those areas where hindus are being victimised by the muslim pampering govts. then weshall come to one conclusion: searching hindu terrorism is like searching for a black cat in a dark room ( when it is not there in the first place).
Answered by Haalayudha Dattuni, 09 Jan '11 01:42 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Both are same - both are misguided miscreant's run by a bad interpreter of the scripture's/ or a vengful vendetta
Source: LOGIC
Answered by simon waaras, 09 Jan '11 10:23 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

Action needed against the Biased investigation. Such story is not true and it will boomerang in due course of time...more

Answered by kishore malhotra