The headlines of an article in the most prominent newspaper of India (TOI of today) says - "Intel agencies ignored Hindu terror clues to probe jihad". Then it goes on to say that "Convinced that Islamic terrorists were responsible for major acts of terror, investigators ignored leads or possible lines of investigation into incidents like blasts at Malegaon, Mecca Masjid, Samjhauta Express and Ajmer".
Question- What is the difference between the two terrors which are mentioned in this report (Hindu terror and Islamic terror)?
Your vote on this answer has already been received
A cornered cat fights back. in the name of secularism the govt. systematically ignored the value systems of the hindus while pampering the minorities for votes and thus coming to and staying in power. no one expected this kind of reaction because violence in this form was never known to hindus. world wide we know which particular community breeds terrorists. we know which community does not and in fact till date has never learnt to accept community with different faiths than their own. the question to be asked is why is not the so called hindu terror found in other countries and why only in those areas where hindus are being victimised by the muslim pampering govts. then weshall come to one conclusion: searching hindu terrorism is like searching for a black cat in a dark room ( when it is not there in the first place).