What could be the possible fall out of Bombay high court's decision to acquit Sabahuddin and Fahim Ansari, who, according to the police were the men who conducted a survey for the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. Your views?
No substantial evidence, insufficient proofs and benefit of doubt is given to both. Police could not establish any solid links between them and the real culprits, based on weak supporting documents court could do nothing but acquit them.
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Two Indian nationals, alleged to be co-accomplices in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, have been acquitted by the Bombay High Court which upheld the death sentence to Pakistani terrorist Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab has acquitted them for lack of evidence upholding trail courts verdict .As per law the accused gets benefit of doubt and it is for the prosecution to prove the case to the hilt .