Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Riots in Assam,CM not responsible.Riots in JK ,CM not responsible.Riots in Gujarat ,CM responsible.What logic is this?
When it comes to Mr.Narendra Modi becoming the PM of the country,BJP says forget 2002 riots because it is past.See his development model n judge his capability.But why the same BJP is talking about Mughal invasion,which is past n has nothing to do with Indian Muslims.I am confused.Could u please explain?

Tags: gujarat, responsible, assam
Asked by Damodar Biswal, 11 Aug '13 02:48 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (19)

1.

There is a Bengali slang.. "Jhuri chapa" .. BJP wants to do this to Gujarat Riots.

BJP is directionless.. they do not know what to talk and what to do.. They are Liaisoners and NOT Leaders.
Answered by Sharmila Bose, 12 Aug '13 10:32 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Assam CM, J&K CM did not order the govt machinery (including police) and local goonda gangs and VHP goondas to go and selectively kill and burn and slit open pregnant women's stomachs of a particular community.
CM Modi told them to carry out their massacre for full Three days, and then stop.
The whole world saw on TV, Babu Bajrangi types of Modi goons saying all this on TV and boasting of how they took out foetus on their sword and swirled it around in air.
That's why no other communal riots can be equated with Gujarat Two Thousand and Two riots.
CMs are not meant to use their powers as CM and arrange for massacre of helpless people of their own state. Modi can be compared to Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Saddam (for officially massacring millions of Kurd Muslims in Iraq) and other such blood thirsty dictators.
This is enough reason for his NOT becoming PM of India.
Answered by QueSera Sera, 12 Aug '13 12:59 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (3)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Crux of the problem is Congress` 'Vote Bank' politic', where Congress exploits Muslim of their votes and thus divides the nation. Polarization starts from here. And fundamentalism gets boosted. Congress was first to form an alliance with Muslim League and MIM. only to grab power. And it calls itself as 'Secular'.
Answered by kishore malhotra, 12 Aug '13 02:01 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Jai shri ram in india special treatment for muslims due to vote bank politics.in spite of so many terror attacks and sleeping cell who help terrorists, still one can listen anti national slogans by muslims but our politicians and secularists and human rightists are harsh only on hindus but take side with muslims.there were at least 100 riots in india mostly in cong./sp ruled states but neither media nor politicians blame.in kistwar violence in jk it was anti national muslim crowd attack but media pol. are silent when hindus suffer but blame only modi.bjp/hindus afraid with muslims
Answered by Ramesh Agarwal, 11 Aug '13 04:21 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Traditional ruling pattern held for might to be the order of the day & religion played considerable part.Having under gone conversion by force,mostly;Hidoos donot find it digestable that those converties if rolled back to same start of point of their opting a different religion,are of same blood,then why the role of converted religion is so much dreaded to bring-forthe blood brothers to draggers end merely on difference of faith,&,now forceful conversions are not easy for that violent faith.
Untransparant cover up of facts & non-speaking truth & facts of conversion & butchering Hindoos like in Somnath,Multan,Delhi etc with no regret by any corner,has ben a complexed cause.
Answered by vishwabandhubajpai, 11 Aug '13 04:19 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Thatz the irony of the Indian state of affairs.....itz the islamic lobby which is backed by those pseudo secular political parties who constantly throwing mud on NARENDRA MODI ... on the charge of riots occurred in Gujraat....if he is to be convicted then why not Abdullah father & son in J&K, and Tarun Gogoi in Assam.....be convicted of the riots occurred in their states....?Are they different in status from Gujuraat?
Answered by Stupidcommonman, 11 Aug '13 02:56 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

Modi appears to be an autocrat when it comes to Hindutwa.
Answered by ts, 13 Aug '13 01:21 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Accountability is lost and center always passing the buck on states
Answered by saranathan Narasimhan, 13 Aug '13 01:02 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

Yes
there is a big divide
Answered by anil garg, 12 Aug '13 11:37 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

This is called Indian politics in free worlds largest democratic country mera Bharat mahan
Answered by Paivaidya Ajit, 12 Aug '13 10:15 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Previous

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining