Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

R you satisfied with the security measures taken by the State Govt at public places??

Tags: travel, govt, state govt
Asked by cyrus irani, 17 Feb '10 07:37 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering     Map Successfully AddedAdd Map
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (8)

 
1.

Union Home Minister P Chidambaram himself says that Pune blast was not the result of any intelligence failure but an 'insidious' planting of a bomb in a 'soft' target establishment, it means home minister himself is lackadaisical towards the threat posed by terrorists. He added, "he area of Koregaon Park, housing Jewish Chabad House and Osho Ashram, had been sensitized by police since it was on the radar of terrorists but it was difficult to provide 24/7 security to all soft targets." Further, he said, "establishments have to themselves adopt security measures since it was not possible for police to check every person, bag or place at all times." It means every man is responsible for his own safety. Government would only sensitize the soft targets sleepy security personnel and it would do nothing more. While the terrorists will be free to move explosive from one place to another the security will not do anything about it. Why can't they carry out the random checks at cities entry point ...more
Answered by Jack Johnson, 17 Feb '10 08:23 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

No, we have long way to go with innovative methods
Answered by saranathan Narasimhan, 18 Feb '10 02:56 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Security measures are alright but the security personel should be highly spirited and not friendly with the underworld.
Answered by manoj thakur, 18 Feb '10 12:09 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

No as is seen in the past.Even on intelligent clues have ignored
Answered by Narayana Raja, 18 Feb '10 06:53 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Not much can be done in our country due to huge population and the expenditure required to substantially upgrade the security system. Then the enemy looks like us in appearance so they easily mix up in the crown. Actually killing innoceny people is not a big deal in our circumstances. Except for a few high security establishments, people can be targeted everywhere easily.
Answered by Prashant, 17 Feb '10 09:52 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Naaaah :( nothing changed
Answered by conviction, 17 Feb '10 08:54 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

Only one word , no as an answer. otherwise, our dear friend Johnson have explained beautifully and there is no need for me to explain anything.
Answered by Gopal, 19 Feb '10 12:25 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

How will my yes or no matter on this subject ?
Answered by nkpathak, 18 Feb '10 05:46 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

Politicians take undue advantage of this happenings , others suffer and politicians and Power mongers enjoy this :New Delhi: BJP president Nitin Gadka..more

Answered by jameel ahmed