Q.
Does the Hyderabad blast indicate that we are unable to react to intelligence inputs?
Asked by Farhaan,
23 Feb 09:19 am
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (7)
1.
I think to divert the attention of public from Telengana issue
& lack of security when the centre already informed states
to take precautions measures.
Answered by yusuf syed, 28 Feb 02:11 pm
& lack of security when the centre already informed states
to take precautions measures.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Rather itz a clear indication of careless approach & ignorance of intelligence inputs....
Answered by Pradipta pati, 23 Feb 10:12 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
Yes, you are right. This is indeed a shame for government as it has again failed to act upon the intelligence inputs. The fact that Dilsukhnagar was targeted before, police and security agencies failed to take effective measure to combat such terrorist acts and prevent them from taking place again. In what can only be termed an audacious act, the terrorists even cut off the cables of the CCTV wires at the blast site in Hyderabads Dilsukh Nagar. It could be a retaliatory action by the terrorist groups against the hanging of Ajmal Kasab and 2001 Parliament attack accused Afzal Guru. After the execution of Afzal Guru, Pakistan based terror outfits had vowed vengeance. However, the unpleasant truth is that the much-vaunted police modernization effort the government began after 26/11 across the country has just not delivered.
Answered by sumati gayki, 23 Feb 09:27 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received