Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Jai shri ram there were about 100 riots in india after independence many in congress and other ruled states but media is why targetting only modi and not tarun gagoi for assam, akhilesh/azam for up, expulsion of pundits from valley for muslims of valley, is not biased and partial showing hatred towards bjp/modi and hindus?

Tags: india, education, media
Asked by Ramesh Agarwal, 07 Apr 03:19 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (8)

 
1.

There has been 100s of riot in India, mainly the 1969 riots of gujarat, the Assam Riots, The Mumbai Riots, The gujarat riots of 2002, Hyderabad riots, the Meerut riots, the Riots in Bihar, the 1984 anti sikh riots, just to name a few huge ones. However, the politicians pick up 2002 riots of gujarat only, because think that its the only way to thwart Modi's growth and occupying PM's chair, and its the best way to create a sense of fear amongst all minorities. However they dont tell the people tha t in past 12 years there has been not a single riot in Gujarat
Answered by rajnikant raiyarela, 07 Apr 03:29 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Kyon bhai modi aapke koi najdeeki rishtedar hai kaya chot use kar rahen hai log and dard aapko ho raha hai. usko to jitna maara jaye utna hee kum hai
Answered by iqbal seth, 07 Apr 03:20 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (5)
Not Useful
 (3)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

STOP PREACHING COMMUNAL HATRED , IT ONLY HELPS POLITICIANS , RATHER PREACH LOVE BROTHERHOOD THAT IS FOR PEACE FOR ALL INdians
Answered by harish chandra, 07 Apr 03:36 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (3)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Media is partial dear Ramesh Agarwal
Answered by jameel ahmed, 07 Apr 03:20 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (2)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Yes.
Such partiality is condemnable.
Answered by Prakash Chandra, 07 Apr 03:21 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Their one point agenda:some how prevent NaMo from Becoming PMFOR THIS SORDID AGENDA THEY HAVE GOT SUPPORT FROM ALL ANTI NATIONAL ELEMENTS AND SECULARISTS(MEANING ANTI HINDUS)
Answered by SREENIVAS, 07 Apr 03:27 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (3)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

These politicians have one common agenda of wooing minority people with such sweet talks and doing nothing for them
Answered by saranathan Narasimhan, 07 Apr 04:08 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Yes,
Answered by shashvat, 07 Apr 03:28 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining