Fortunately, in recent years quite a few Hindu historians have come out in the open disputing those allegations. For example, historian Babu Nagendranath Banerjee rejected the accusation of forced conversion of Hindus by Muslim rulers by stating that if that was their intention then in India today there would not be nearly four times as many Hindus compared to Muslims, despite the fact that Muslims had ruled for nearly a thousand years. Banerjee challenged the Hindu hypothesis that Aurangzeb was anti-Hindu by reasoning that if the latter were truly guilty of such bigotry, how could he appoint a Hindu as his military commander-in-chief? Surely, he could have afforded to appoint a competent Muslim general in that position. Banerjee further stated: "No one should accuse Aurangzeb of being communal minded. In his administration, the state policy was formulated by Hindus. Two Hindus held the highest position in the State Treasury. Some prejudiced Muslims even questioned the merit of his dec ...more

Who knows what happened years and years back but same people who tell this sort of thing destroyed Babri masjid and golden temple in free democratic India

We know RELIGION has made the history of mankind very ugly. No need to ponder over it now. What does it matter now.......what happened 100s of years back? Let us look at present times, there are many VIOLENT KILLERS engaged in terrorists activities quoting scriptures and religious principles !
How can we handle that?

Many truths about history are hidden

I would just like to say please don't dig the graves please live peacefully in today and live behind a good legacy for future generations. Please don't teach what bad happened in past so that they will grow with open mind and secular mentality.