Distinction is often made between erotica and pornography , although depending on the viewer they may seem one and the same. Pornography's objective is the graphic depiction of sexually explicit scenes. Pornography is often described as exploitative or degrading

They are like Literature and pulp fiction.

Branches of same tree

No it is not

Even though many people regard these two orientations to human sexuality as overlapping (and some even as identical), I see them as existing on essentially different planes. And in this brief essay I'll attempt to explain why.

It's not a coincidence that when scholars reflect on eroticism in the fine arts, they're frequently considering the human form as the artist has more or less idealized it. Whether the visual medium is drawing, engraving, lithography, painting, sculpture, photography, or film, they view the creator as striving to capture a certain almost inexpressible beauty about the human anatomy, or the act of love. And since the very perception of beauty--or that which is aesthetic--is ultimately subjective, they're generally aware that one artist's sense of the beautiful might actually be another's plain or homely. Further, they can appreciate that an artist's perception of beauty might have as much to do with inner attractiveness, charm, or loveliness than with any outwar ...more

Source: google search

Every Erotica may not be Porn .But All Porns are Erotica .The main difference is the Detail in which an act is Described .Then Porn have Their own Classifications .Which varies with respect to illustarions and variations in Graphics Characters .Describing a beauty may be a Erotica , but certainly it can not be Porn .