Barack Obama went to d Taj Hotel, where two years before, Pakistani terrorist, took d whole city of Mumbai to ransom. They killed more than 200 people in d hotels, in CST station n on d roads of Mumbai. He presented a single white rose 2 d memorial of those killed in Taj hotel n wrote a note in d visitors' book. He said he is honored to be in India. He offered condolences to d killed tourists, including d Israeli couple, leaving their child an orphan. But he never uttered a word about who was responsible for these things. Comments plz.
He was simply being diplomatic...Obama is one of the most intelligent and well read US president, he'd come well prepared...Every one knows that US adopts a double policy . If US really wants to help us, they shud simply stop providing military support to Pakistan.
Your vote on this answer has already been received
The whole nation asking the same question! Why not he name the main culprit, Pakistan as epicenter of all such terrorist activities? What interest has he got in hiding Pak's name? President Obama has disappointed Indians by refusing to label Pakistan as a country harboring terrorists. To the contrary he expressed his understanding of why Pakistan has been slow in ending militancy. He has decided to shower billions of dollars in additional aid on Pakistan without even defining benchmarks for judging progress. Worse yet, the Obama administration has neither acknowledged Pakistans role in staging terrorist strikes in India nor made the slightest effort to help bring the Pakistan-based planners of the unparalleled Mumbai attacks to justice. In other words, when Washington refuses to even recognize the problem, can New Delhi really expect the US to be of any help? In fact, Washington is doing is making light of Indian concerns vis--vis Pakistan by asking New Delhi to adopt a flexible appro