Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

A sitting Supreme Court judge today supported the inclusion of the Prime Minister's Office within the ambit of Lokpal Bill tabled in Parliament on Thursday."As a student of law, I see no substance in the debate that the Prime Minister should be outside the (Lokpal) Bill. A public office of such importance cannot shy away from public scrutiny," Justice A K Ganguly said.- What do you say ?

Tags: ganguly, supreme court, prime minister
Asked by venkatesaldevarajan, 06 Aug '11 06:25 am
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (2)

 
1.

Yes..i dont think there is any point why pm will nt be included...bt dont know why fight is there...pm is also a person like us.......and in any post the person never matter..bcoz after him there will someone new...so the seat matters..and people pay respect to the post...so why the ppost will be excleded....is it giving high return to the ;leaders,or maintaing lifes of netas..or if such odd things are happening then only be a matter to fight other wise nt
Answered by p aparajita, 06 Aug '11 06:37 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Valid and correct as long as Judges also come under the ambit of the same law
Answered by Shashi LS, 06 Aug '11 06:29 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

Yes, you are correct. those era is gone . now each and every players are contributing and hence i think we are started to win overseas also. The credi..more

Answered by Gopal