Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

In 2010, our PM - MMS assured the PM of England G. Brown that the deal between Vodafone and Hutch will not be taxed . By proposing a retrospective amendment to law and taxing the transaction has the FM suceeded in portraying the PM in poor light before the International community?

Tags: money, mms, pm
Asked by sridhar santhanam, 25 Apr '12 01:33 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (2)

 
1.

I think the needs of our country and framing proper policies or even amending laws with retrospective effect are much more important that pleasing the PM of England.
Answered by HEMANT MEHTA, 25 Apr '12 01:36 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Finance Minister is more worried about poor light before the national community which is correct also.
Answered by sushil trivedi, 25 Apr '12 01:37 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining