Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

When inadvertence has become excusable for politicians and ministers or public servants with in the four corners of jurisprudence , why same innocuous inadvertence could not be extended for a train driver or an air pilot ?

Tags: travel, entertainment, environment
Asked by venkatesaldevarajan, 05 Feb '12 03:15 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering     Map Successfully AddedAdd Map
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (3)

 
1.

Because they r not the law makers.In our country the law is equal for all but some people r more equal than others.The politicians come under the second category.
View Map
View Map
Answered by Damodar Biswal, 05 Feb '12 03:20 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Inadvertence stems from a lack of attentiveness, inattention, or fault from negligence. However, mere inadvertence does not warrant relief unless, on consideration of all the evidence, the inadvertence is excusable. Forgetting about the case or mislaying the summons and complaint are not sufficient grounds for relief. Inadvertence is often combined with excusable neglect.
Answered by jameel ahmed, 05 Feb '12 03:20 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Good logic
Answered by ambuj kumar, 05 Feb '12 03:17 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

Five..more

Answered by anushka desai