Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

The Aussies propose to introduce Fresh and unknown evidence hitherto - stump mike recordings - transcripts.

In your opinion why was this not provided earlier to the Indian camp or Mike Procter as evidence.

Do you see any sinister move or motive behind such a late introduction of evidence.

Tags: opinion, aussies, evidence
Asked by Rekha Gopalan, 28 Jan '08 03:39 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (3)

1.

This is only to save face
Answered by sankar gm, 28 Jan '08 03:40 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

there is a saying.. `` MY SHIP MY COMMAND`` hope u got the point
Answered by Raj Nair, 28 Jan '08 03:40 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Aussies are never known for sportsmanship!! Treveor Chappel bowled under arm to win a test..!! They started bodyline bowling.. when helmet was not there.. !! They called Muralidharan a chukker.. when their own Bret lee seems to be one!!! That seems insufficient hence the went ahead and fixed Bajji on racism when he started picking up Ricky Pointing very often!!!

Its just another move .. to shield themselves..!!
Answered by MS Prasad, 28 Jan '08 03:49 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining