Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Maharashtra ATS is Linking Col.Prasad Purohit with Samjhauta Express blasts ,where as our Foreign Office & US Intelligence maintains that the blasts were organised by Let militants./The same office Purohit was the person appointed by Army for training the same ATS once upon a time..Do you think ATS will be able to prove their story in Court..?

Tags: relationships, education, army
Asked by ranjith nambiar, 26 Oct '09 01:02 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (3)

1.

They are now trying to cover up their short comings and put all the blasts in the country on him
Answered by rajnikant raiyarela, 26 Oct '09 01:03 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Few things point out to the fact that the blast on Samjhauta Express in the year 2007 was the work of Hindu expremeist group.

The day after the bombings, Indian police stated that the suitcase bomb attack was the work of at least four or five people with a possible militant connection. The police also released sketches of two suspects who the police Inspector General said had left the train just fifteen minutes before the explosions.The police say that one of the men was around 35 or 36 years old, "plumpish" and dark, with a moustache, and the second was around 26 or 27, wearing a scarf wrapped around his head. The police also stated that both men were speaking Hindi.

The attack was first blamed on Islamic militants from Pakistan. Initial media reports suggested that the prime suspects in the bombing were the Islamic groups Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, both of whom have been blamed for many high-profile bombings in the past. But later Haryana police added some Hindu ext ...more
Answered by Jack Johnson, 26 Oct '09 01:37 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Very difficult to prove.
Answered by roopa, 26 Oct '09 01:06 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

U...... wd the prize of Happineess..more

Answered by Good Boy