Q.
MNIK. . . . . @450 million rupees loss of business in mumbai, maharashtra... for what? was that controversy necessary for SRK?
Asked by bharati sharma,
11 Feb '10 11:26 pm
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (6)
1.
Who cares anyways? Why does Bollywood pay obesicence to the Thackerays. They have to pay the price some day. It is better if the public boycotts the movie.
Answered by Saj Sierra, 11 Feb '10 11:35 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
Thats good sign...........shahrukh has soft corner towards PAKIS players......but he forget than whenever we support pakis we get just human loss...........when we run samjauta express they give us kargil war-99 when we bein frd......they give us 26/11..........why to keep soft corner for PAKIS..........shahrukh is proudy n money oriented over actor......who just success by crying fool love stories and by over smartness
Answered by krunal modi, 12 Feb '10 12:10 am
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
I doubt if that film has made a loss @450 million Rs. and 45 crore is peanuts for tht film which is released all over the world. SRK will make more money overseas than in India. SRK purposely created this controversy to promote his film bcuz he knows badpublicity is still Free Publicity for the film......
Answered by Kuldeep Khatau, 11 Feb '10 11:31 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
But controversies are specially created to garner attention by these marathi parties
Answered by gaurav shokeen, 11 Feb '10 11:28 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
I feel we can invite anybody from any part of the world for playing game with us in a friendly manner but to pay them crores of rupees which this rich man have generated from our country should not be gifted to them.it can be put to better use in our own country for lakhs of poor people for education,medical treatment and feed hungry
Answered by Harsh Mehta, 12 Feb '10 02:55 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received