Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Dynastic rule in India has come to stay. Is that the inference one should draw from the elevation of Rahul Gandhi in the Congress party? Your views?

Tags: india, congress, gandhi
Asked by Good Citizen, 21 Jan '13 12:50 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (8)

1.

As i have mentioned in my answer to your previous question Congress has once again resorted to the dynastic policies to elevate him. This is not right for them as Rahul has failed as a Leader to draw public attention or show the maturity which is needed to be the Nation's choice. It will only hamper the party's chances in the National elections due next year!!
Answered by dharamender nebhnani, 22 Jan '13 10:08 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
 
2.

Yes, but this inference can be drawn not just by the elevation of Rahul Gandhi to the post of VC, thus clearing the decks for him to be their candidate for the post of PM, come the next general elections. Yes, the Congress party and the Nehru family might have started this trend, but it is happening to almost every party and one of the primary reason for this becoming a contagious disease is the realization that politics is the best business in which you earn without putting in much effort and energy. Every parent wants their children to study and get the best of job opportunities, so in that sense they are doing what they feel is the better future for their children. Again in order to prove ourselves wrong we have at least one weapon, which may have lost its edge over the years but still can be potent is our vote. If we vote judiciously and make an effort to elect the most suitable candidate, no one can treat it as the dynasty of their children. But for that at least we should have a ...more
Answered by Manoj Adwani, 21 Jan '13 08:09 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

WeIndians have no backbone so we depend on Italian passport holder. Immature guy who cannot settle his own choice of marriage.When he is going to marry?
Answered by samson aseervatham, 22 Jan '13 07:19 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Congress is well known for dynasty rule since beginning it is true cong. cann!t survive without gandhi!s name.only bjp and left are true democratic parties while others are either following dynastic policies or one man party.
Answered by Ramesh Agarwal, 21 Jan '13 09:32 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

It is rather in worshipping the foreing origin people whom the local aged and learned leaders also have the genes to obey to
Answered by Om Shrivastava, 21 Jan '13 12:57 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Yes you have inferred it rightly
Answered by rajnikant raiyarela, 21 Jan '13 12:51 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

No, a political party is free to choose anyone to lead. U may b referring to d selection of Rahul to d post of VP of Cong. Being son of Sonis shudnt b a disqualification.
Answered by Babu K, 21 Jan '13 01:25 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Congress is dynastic party.Its rule is not for granted.BJP could seize this opportunity of weak leadership in cong.and provide an alternate.
Answered by bhaskara rao, 24 Jan '13 05:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining