Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Does Sanjay Dutt deserve any sympathies???

Tags: sanjay dutt, news & events, dutt
Asked by Farhaan, 23 Mar '13 09:07 am
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (15)

1.

The sympathies that Sanjay Dutt is generating from the Film industry which has great influence in the Political parties.. May be Amar Singh is doing some lobby bazi towards this.. I wondered what made Justice Katju to give such statement in favour of Sanjay Dutt..
Answered by Sharmila Bose, 23 Mar '13 10:08 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Court decision is final, let us not talk about sympathy, if any one deserves dympathy it is victims of athat bomb blast and their relatives
Answered by SREENIVAS, 23 Mar '13 09:10 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Yes, since he has given up all the bad habit and repented over his wrong deeds and leading a very gentle life serving the common people, he deserve the sympathy from us.
Answered by ajay, 23 Mar '13 12:33 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Yes he do deserve sympathies and thats why he has been charged only under arms act........
Answered by INDER VIG, 23 Mar '13 10:22 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Supreme court has acquitted him from the charges of terrorist activity.....bcz of no evidence....and acquisition of wmd like AK 56 and other arms had been framed against him....which was surely to be considered to be a crime as per the Indian arms act.....but this never confirm that the man was anyway a threat to the society.....moreover his loyalty to the law and social welfare activity proves that he is never a man to be considered being a criminal...hence acquitting him off the punishment may not be wrong......
Answered by Pradipta pati, 23 Mar '13 09:22 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Yes
Answered by Manju Sikri, 23 Mar '13 09:18 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

No harm in being symphatatic at all
Answered by iqbal seth, 23 Mar '13 09:13 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Since he have already jail and further not found in ant such like activity , as such may be considered ji
Answered by Dhuni, 23 Mar '13 09:11 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

The law does nothing to reform criminals. we are talking about india and not UK. here they are treated like dirt in jails. i have seen the real position in my social service.
the aim must be to curb crime , eliminate crime and not criminal. in this case , sanjay dutt had a 20 year crime free life , he is a reformed man and in no way danger to society. so he deserves mercy
Answered by Ataur Rahman, 29 Mar '13 10:59 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

Sajay Dutt definitely deserves sympathy and he is a reformed man now. But sympathy does not mean remission of sentence awarded by Supreme Court. Punishment should go according to the crime committed by the offender. If an exception is made in one case, other case will come with merrit or no merrit. Can that be said, Sanjay Dutt deserves and others not.
Answered by dinkar shetty, 23 Mar '13 04:11 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Previous

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining