Some bowler excels on a given day-
Zaheer bowled 3 maiden overs to begin in the final-The last 2 overs cost him 35 runs and possibly the match-At the end his figures were 10-3-60-2 and Sreesant- Played after 41 days (First match he platyed was on Feb 19 ) and he went for 8-052-0 ! Is it fair to Blame Sreesanth considering the fact that he was laid off for 41 days ??
Zaheer on occasions was good...but against pakistan and sri lanka...his second spell was atrocious. Harbhajan is not the same bowler any more....so why blame Sreeshanth alone.
But the question still remains that we had to drop our most incisive bowler Nehra...then why not play Ashwin....he would have been a better choice.
But Sreesanth is a lucky mascot for Dhoni...and he was preferred...not for variety...but for that bit of luck !
Your vote on this answer has already been received
I think Sreesanth is a very good bowler and deserves to remain within the team always. He needs the Captain's trust as is was done by Ganguly upon Nehera and Jahira. I don't think Sreesanth made any damage in the final after getting a chance for over 41 days. Thanks.