Q.
Do think that ramayan and mahabharat r having some amount of truth in it???
Asked by sonali T,
03 May '08 08:33 pm
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (10)
1.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
dont know yaar who have seen all these
its truth or not,
but if people are been saying this since decades so there must be truth in it
Answered by Pooja, 03 May '08 08:36 pm
its truth or not,
but if people are been saying this since decades so there must be truth in it
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Every mythological tale has some nucleus around which the stories are wooven.Every fiction has hidden facts/reality around it.The current fictions have more facts around them whereas old fictions cannot be supposed to be like that.They have undergone many editions/alterations with time.Over time, the history transforms itself into story, fiction and even mythology.The Ramayana and Mahabharat should be viewed fom this standpoint.There must have been some real historical persons initially that formed the 'nucleus'.After several centuries later, we have increased component of story than history in them.Thus,they are both real and unreal at the same time.The truth in them, therefore, has to be discovered individually.But we cannot accept them as historical truths.
Answered by Ramsingh Sachan, 03 May '08 11:15 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.
Dont mind , If sri Ram was god then at the end why did he took Agni pariksha for smt Sita, did suspect his wife. If for the people he did then why did he not stand with her.Even he would also been proved. Why did the good men ( Yudi-bhima-arjun etc) sold their wife in a gambling. Why did they not safe her when she was being undressed, why did sri Krishna only saved, were they all cowards. But yes we do get a lesson .
Answered by Zafar, 04 May '08 03:48 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received