Almost through out during the tennis career of Pete Sampras he had to encounter Andre Agassi, an equally tough opponent. Where as Roger Fedrer had a relatively easy passage until the recent emergence of Rafel Nadal, who is also in the injured list now. Is this a fair comparison? Your views?
I dont think it is Federer's fault that no one else can challenge him. On the other hand, one wouldnt consider Nadal and Roddick as bad players. Just that Federer has dominated them on most occasions. To compare Sampras and Federere would be difficult, but everyone knew that Sampras had a poor record on Clay Court. His best performance in French Open is a loss in the semis in 13 attempts, whereas Federere has one win, 3 runner-up, and one semifinalist in 11 attempts