Q.
Answers (9)
1.
A person who attacked parliament is not deserved for any trial
Shoot at sight shd be the punishment
But our country being great democratic country he was arrested and undergone trial
Anyway now he is no more
It is not fair to talk about that person
Answered by sigma, 12 Feb 10:59 am
Shoot at sight shd be the punishment
But our country being great democratic country he was arrested and undergone trial
Anyway now he is no more
It is not fair to talk about that person
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
Why such an hullabaloo on the execution of a dreaded terrorist, who conspired to be the mastermind to attack the Sanctum Sanctorum of Indian Democracy aimed at killing the PM, HM and blasting it off, which brought the two nations at the brink of a bloody war with Operation Parakram costing the invaluable lives of our thousands of soldiers. Such an act, beyond an inkling of doubt, amounts to the Rarest of Rare category of crime. Notwithstanding the same, he was subjected to a decade long trial during which he, himself cross examined the witnesses, given the law of the land.
In fact, he should have been hanged in the public for betraying and waging a war against his own Country, which should have been an instance for such traitors and their collaborators.
In fact, he should have been hanged in the public for betraying and waging a war against his own Country, which should have been an instance for such traitors and their collaborators.
Source: siachen
Answered by Siachen, 12 Feb 11:09 am
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Had he done anything FAIR by attacking parliament of India .. ??? he got what he deserved in the end.
Answered by Manoj Joshi, 12 Feb 10:57 am
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
Aise logon ko fair trials .abhi bhi bachane ki koshish?jo mare unka kya?
Answered by babu rao, 12 Feb 11:30 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Right you are !
The entire 'JUDICIARY" should undergo a radical reformations.
All "JUDGEMENTS" must be by 3-judge bench + 7 juror trials, to be completed within THREE months.
AND, the nuisances of "APPEALS" & "CLEMENCY" to the Higher Courts & The President, M U S T be totally scrapped from the JUDICIARY.
Answered by Kanai Chakraberti, 12 Feb 11:12 am
The entire 'JUDICIARY" should undergo a radical reformations.
All "JUDGEMENTS" must be by 3-judge bench + 7 juror trials, to be completed within THREE months.
AND, the nuisances of "APPEALS" & "CLEMENCY" to the Higher Courts & The President, M U S T be totally scrapped from the JUDICIARY.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received