Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Indian doctor Mohammed Haneef, who was wrongly accused of links with the failed UK bombings, in an embarrassment to the Australian government, the federal court on Friday giving him clean chit restored the work visa of Haneef, nearly five months after he was exonerated of terror charges. Haneef says that he will return to Australia only if authorities assured him that his family and he would be "safe" in the country. What do you think over this and do you support his decision of going back there and continue working or do you feel that he shouldnt go there again?

Tags: months, family, australia
Asked by Rukhsana.Siddiqui, 25 Dec '07 10:18 am
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (12)

 
1.

Nope I dont support his decision of going back. He should instead seek better avenues in India itself rather than going back to racist Australia
Answered by Saj Sierra, 25 Dec '07 08:46 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

he should go there.
Answered by arun mishra, 25 Dec '07 10:19 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

He should reconsider his decision
Answered by Anil K Chugh, 25 Dec '07 11:11 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

I cannot support his decision. Because the man trapped was innocent. And the people who lost their life in different part of world were also innocents.
Answered by peekay first, 25 Dec '07 10:39 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

If he feels that he is not guilty then he should go and work .There is nothing wrong in it. .Our inner most soul and decision is above all
Answered by ANURADHA PATHAKJ, 25 Dec '07 10:40 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

If he really wants to prove his innocence and get a clean chit from everybody , he should go there. His not going there may backfire in his attempt to prove his innocence. People will begin to doubt him .
Answered by Mitali Choudhury, 25 Dec '07 12:10 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

why not if he goes it prooves that he was innocent and he should do it
Answered by babu rao, 25 Dec '07 10:42 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

No dear he should not go there as this may take several years to develop himself again. When the subject get cools then people may do some thing that may be more dangerous for him and his family.
Answered by Sanjay Pandita, 25 Dec '07 10:30 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

yes he is a great peerson whi did not give up and braught the fact before the government and he should again go back to proove his innosnece which he has already did it giving the message to the others that if u r right never give up
Answered by krish, 25 Dec '07 03:18 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

HANEEF SHD GO BACK TO AUSTRALIA TO PROVE THAT HE IS INNOCENT FROM THE CORE OF HIS HEART . THE ENTIRE WORLD WILL SUPPORT HIM.
BCZ HE IS INNOCENT HE WUD RECEIVE THE SUPPORT OF "INNER VOICE"
ALL OVER THE WORLD. POWER OF WHICH THE GOVT OF AUSTRALIA WILL
REALISE WITH THEIR HEADS DOWN .
Answered by Mrinalendra Banerjee, 25 Dec '07 11:47 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Previous

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining