Using your phone's internet browser
go to:
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.

Asian Games or Commonwealth Games have higher overall standard in terms of the participants performance? Why?

Asked by Good Citizen, 20 Jul '10 11:32 am
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (1)


In world ranking, the CommonWealth games come third, after the Asian Games.. The IOlympics, as expected, ranks first. But, to comnpare the standards of participants of CommonQWealth games and Asian Gmes, is practically difficult. For example, Jamaica participates in the CommonWealth games, and is there any athlete to come anywhere near the Jamaican athletes in the sprint items of 100 Meters and 200 Meters?Who cqan beat the kenyans in the long distance races of 5000Meters, 10000 Meters and the marathon? dont forget that Nigeria has world class athletes in 100 M and 200M. Australians as an athletic team, is a force to reckon with..Great sprinters of Japan, Quatar and SriLanka and women athletes from India had set the tracks ablaze in the last asian Games. But can they stand upto the performance of the mightier athletes from non-asian CommonWealth countries, competing in the same items, is anybody\'s guess.
Answered by thampy chacko, 20 Jul '10 02:16 pm

Report abuse
Not Useful
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer


I agree ji! I just can't understand how FIFA rankings work. A underdog team like North Korea (rank 105) gets paired w/ Brazil (rank 1), Portugal (rank..more

Answered by A Moin