Q.
Beating Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka is a tough task. Without a good pace attack, can the present Indian team there achieve that feat?
Asked by Josna,
14 Jul '10 10:42 am
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (5)
1.
I think its a totally flawed slection as far as the pace department is concerned. I wonder why RP Singh, and Irfan Pathan are not being selected. Munaf, Ishant and Abhimanyu Mithun do not pose any threats. But if they are able to support the spinners then the team has a good chance . Thats because the pitches in Sri lanka do not support pace, in any case,
The batting dept looks in full strenght. So its likely to be a closely fought contest.
Answered by RAJAN MHAMAI, 14 Jul '10 05:25 pm
The batting dept looks in full strenght. So its likely to be a closely fought contest.
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
I guess the spin trio has to play a really crucial role .... looking at the practice match scorecard, it looks as if the same story is gonna repeat in each test .... the Indians would be highly reliable on the batsmen to spoil the Sri Lankan party .... I have my fingers crossed!
Answered by Cartoon Network, 14 Jul '10 05:58 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
Worldwide the pace attack is weak. So is India. Srilanka too are in the same mold. Occasional brilliance may hold key to both the countries. If Harbajan could get into farm quickly then it could help matters.
Answered by MS Prasad, 14 Jul '10 11:00 am
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
May be the Indian govt will ask the srilankan govt how they want the game to be played and accordingly our players will be instructed. Eg. Earlier we helped them in the same way to when sent in IPKF.
Answered by Mathi Sankaramoorthy, 14 Jul '10 10:39 am
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Report abuse
Useful
(0)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received