Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

Are you unhappy with Mumbai Cricket Association's step against SRK?

Tags: cricket, sports, city guide
Asked by soumyen sarkar, 19 May '12 10:51 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering     Map Successfully AddedAdd Map
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (14)

1.

After reading versions of both the MCA officials and SRK, I find that this episode could be tackled in a more matured way than allowing it to go the way they did.
I feel the MCA officials are mixing politics at the instance of some politicians.
I am not happy with MCA's step against SRK.
Answered by Francisco, 19 May '12 11:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (3)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
 
2.

Yes and no.
1. It appears there are doses of heavy politics in this matter. Five years ban at Wankhede stadium is unreasonable and perhaps unconstituitional. Politics cannot be suspected as the MCA has Congress officials as the head.
2.On the other hand I felt that SRK should not be seen even talking to the security guards or officials. Instead he should go with his complaint to the top officials of MCA however serious the offence is. The fact that SRK had an open brawl which was widely reported in the media gave one the impression that it was a publcity stunt of a kind. For wrong publicity see reason given by me as point no.5.
3. If the guard claimed that SRK was drunk, he should have been subjected to appropriate examination which did not happen. The MCA officials are known to enjoy drinks in the late evenings. They should also have been examined for alchohol abuse.
4. What if the KKR refuses to play future matches at Wankhede? Then the stadium at New Mumbai will become the ne ...more
Answered by sridhar santhanam, 20 May '12 01:59 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Who knows these cheap communal MCA officials ?
where were they when Thackeray dug up the pitch ?
Answered by confusion, 19 May '12 11:06 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (3)
Not Useful
 (4)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Mca did the right thing....nobody can be above law ....i am happy.... shameless SRK
Answered by ABC XYZ, 19 May '12 10:57 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (4)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

No rather happy SSji
Decorum shd be maintained
Answered by hitler, 19 May '12 10:54 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (4)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

Mca has done its job...............

will bcci uphold it needs to be seen...............
Answered by mahesh krishna, 19 May '12 10:53 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (3)
Not Useful
 (1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

No, Im not....
Answered by vedprakash sharma, 20 May '12 04:12 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (3)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Yes
Answered by vijay, 20 May '12 12:32 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (3)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

MCA's actions against SRK are deplorable and political. Period. To say more, it would only give vent to frustrations and anger on such maniac acts. Only because Saif Ali Khan happens to be son of a Congress-loyal Ex-Nawab, he has been given presidential honors despite his thrashing journalists and hotel guests.

And how dares Bal Thakrey compare SRK's tolerance in USA with intolerance in India. USA is not his country. He is a foreigner there. For immigration, he needs to respect the immigration procedures of host country. In fact everyone does including Abdul Kaalaam Azad, when he undergoes security check of US-bound airlines.
Answered by manish varma, 20 May '12 09:56 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

No not at all
Answered by rajnikant raiyarela, 20 May '12 07:14 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Previous

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining