Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

What about the cataclysmic genocide of Hiroshima & Nagasaki ?
Wasn't that terrorism and same state is acting as a moral cop now -Comments please

Asked by misconception, 16 Jul '08 12:19 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (21)

1.

The world is watching the history and present. As it is a Jungle law. the strongest will win, and no weaker can object it. The American policy is not new it has been since ages that the Powerful countries have destoryed the nearest enemy to be No 1. When muslim countries tried to fight agaisnt them, In the name of Islam and Jehad the Americans had played two balls with one cue.
That is destroy them as stating Terroist and another blame the religion Islam to promot their religion.
But by Allahs wish the negative marketing have favoured Islam and many Americans are reverting to Islam.

As what has happened to the Kingdome of pharaohs andalike will be thedestiny of present pharaoh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pharaohs
Answered by Zafar, 16 Jul '08 04:00 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

1) Which is the only country in the world to have dropped bombs on over twenty different countries since 1945?
2) Which is the only country to have used nuclear weapons?
3) Which country was responsible for the car bomb which killed 80 civilians in Beirut in 1985 in a botched assassination attempt, there by making it the most lethal terrorist bombing in the Modern day Middle East history?
4) Which countries illegal bombing of Libya was described by the UN legal committee as classic case of terrorism?
5) Which country rejected the order of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to terminate its unlawful use of force against Nicaragua in 1986, and then vetoed the UN Security Council resolution calling all states to follow the international law?
6) Which country was accused by the UN-sponsored truth commission of providing direct and indirect support for acts of genocide against Mayan Indians in Guatemala during 1980s?
7) Which country unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic ...more
Answered by ArifAnwar Khan, 17 Jul '08 01:52 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Little has changed in the imperialist tendencies of American foreign policy since the founding of the United States of America in seventeen eighty-nine. The fledgling United States opened the nineteenth century by stealing the continent of North America from the Indians, while in the process ethnically cleansing them and then finally deporting the pitiful few survivors by means of death marches (a la Bataan) to Bantustans, which in America we call reservations, as in instance of America's manifest destiny to rule the world.
Then, the imperial government of the United States opened the twentieth century by stealing a colonial empire from Spain - in Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines, then inflicting a near-genocidal war against the Filipino people. While at the same time, purporting to annex, the kingdom of Hawaii and subjecting the native Hawaiian people to near-genocidal conditions from which they still suffer today- all in the name of securing America's so-called place i ...more
Answered by angel, 16 Jul '08 01:55 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

Who said that he is moral policing ! if so why north korea is not being controlled and what about israel. so dont ever call USA as a moral cop. it is modern chor ( theif) , in the name of curbing terrorsim it is invading countries to loot their wealth and kill humans so that they dont become a threat to the US. bush is a big fraud and the aftermath of hiroshima and nagasaki is still seen after 60 years.
Answered by joyesh chakraborty, 16 Jul '08 01:22 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

Well, Hiroshima was a terrorism by USA and Pearl Harbour was terrorism by Japan,

com'on Misc, these countries were involved in II world war . Incidences in war are not termed as terrorist.

Now don't twist all definitions.

USA is not moral cop, they are blindly using their muscles to stay powerful in all respect be it financial or millitary. And for everything there is an excuse to offer.
Answered by Daredevils, 16 Jul '08 09:36 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

He has to prepare ammmunition, lakhs of man power for that, crores of billions of expenditute. how to utilise to earn indirectly. There are all the parameters; Statrt a war on any country. Who knows tomorrow who is the victim
Answered by jameel ahmed, 16 Jul '08 12:59 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.

Double Standard..Infact US has killed more than anyone else ..In Japan,Iraq & Vietnam to be precise..US has always misused its military strength..& inflicted heavy civilian losses..
Answered by Ismail Sayyed, 16 Jul '08 12:35 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.

Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to December 31 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.

But could American leaders have known this in August 1945?

The answer is, clearly, yes. The Japanese code had been broken, and Japan's messages were being intercepted.

It was known the Japanese had instructed their ambassador in Moscow to work on peace negotiations with the Allies. Japanese leaders had begun talking of surrender a year before this, and the Emperor himself had begun to suggest, in June 1945, that alternatives to fighting to the end be considered.

On July 13, Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo wired his ambassador in Moscow: "Unconditional ...more
Answered by saumen ganguli, 16 Jul '08 02:08 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.

Yes it is.
personally I hate the current us president.
he should be tried for war crimes in international court of justice.
Answered by luv do, 16 Jul '08 01:13 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.

The biggest tragedy of your Q is Japan is an ally of today's genocide.
The problem with present world population is devil should not enter my home.
Man kind is behind to please the devil, for the penny deal of pleasant life.
I would like to say that this is the sate of bankrupt mind.
For which man kind should prepare for a disasters end.
If they dont want to learn from buried civilizations.
Answered by mohammed assadi, 16 Jul '08 12:41 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
Previous

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) is a UK charity campaigning and working in child protection and the prevention ..more

Answered by GOPI KUMAR