Q.
A lot of Western backpacker travelers who visited India and Pakistan claim that Pakistanis are more like givers and Indians are more like sellers. What could be the reason? Could it be that as a country develops more, people also become more selfish and lose human bonding??
Asked by A Moin,
15 Sep '12 08:07 pm
Earn 10 points for answering
Answers (14)
1.
May be Western want from India for free and they get from Pak.. But India is not fool to do so.. West is anyway looting the World resources thru Weapon and now they want charity...
Answered by Sharmila Bose, 15 Sep '12 09:36 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(2)
Not Useful
(1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.
..true...pakistanis are giving their land for terrorist activities .....for attacking afghan.....and to china for attacking india more comfortably...!!
Answered by drdinesh sharma, 17 Sep '12 01:22 am
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.
You will believe everything good about pakistan blindly.
Answered by Ramesh Agarwal, 15 Sep '12 08:23 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(4)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.
That may be the right observation .
But the reason of this behavior is different i think ..
We have developed more surely and are not awed by Westerners where as Pakistan people are still very much defendant on them .
Human bonding is more here surely and this every Westerner will say ...though may not acknowledge it openly
But the reason of this behavior is different i think ..
We have developed more surely and are not awed by Westerners where as Pakistan people are still very much defendant on them .
Human bonding is more here surely and this every Westerner will say ...though may not acknowledge it openly
Source: Emm Kay .
Answered by Manoj Kakkar, 15 Sep '12 10:01 pm
Report abuse
Useful
(2)
Not Useful
(1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.
Which has more value. Question or answer? Keeping time-pass questions and answers aside, a relevant answer makes both worth. In addition, factors like what has prompted the question, what the answer implies and what is the collective purpose of the QA also play major role in deciding the value of the conversation.
To whom it will be useful to realise a fact like A is giver and B is seller? Quite useful info for a backpacker. A good lesson for tourism industry and tourism ministry. To some extent, though. Because, given a choice, which family will choose the country of givers over the country of sellers mentioned in the above question?
Whether a country is developed or not, fate of the people is dependent on the success and effectiveness of collected and attained sum of knowledge, experience and wisdom. Now gauging on this, India is above Pakistan, as regard to quality of life, though much is still wanted for. People of either side of the border are not bad or good. But, the collectiv ...more
Answered by Krishnakumar Narayanan, 16 Sep '12 12:03 am
To whom it will be useful to realise a fact like A is giver and B is seller? Quite useful info for a backpacker. A good lesson for tourism industry and tourism ministry. To some extent, though. Because, given a choice, which family will choose the country of givers over the country of sellers mentioned in the above question?
Whether a country is developed or not, fate of the people is dependent on the success and effectiveness of collected and attained sum of knowledge, experience and wisdom. Now gauging on this, India is above Pakistan, as regard to quality of life, though much is still wanted for. People of either side of the border are not bad or good. But, the collectiv ...more
Report abuse
Useful
(2)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.
Yes
the one who like his/her belonging and proud on them wont give it like donation to some idiots
Answered by Greasemonkey, 15 Sep '12 08:28 pm
the one who like his/her belonging and proud on them wont give it like donation to some idiots
Report abuse
Useful
(2)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
7.
Report abuse
Useful
(2)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
8.
Yes,so it seems
not only selfish,kind of snobbish too
least concerned about others
except those known to us,then too not all
Answered by alok goel, 15 Sep '12 11:27 pm
not only selfish,kind of snobbish too
least concerned about others
except those known to us,then too not all
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(1)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
9.
We have shared heritage lived together without any problems for tohusands of years before British came and injected the poison .
Answered by TRUTH SEEKER, 16 Sep '12 09:20 am
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
10.
Report abuse
Useful
(1)
Not Useful
(0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received