Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

.....had MMS not been a remote controlled PM how differently he would have worked???

Tags: mms, astrology, news & events
Asked by ashok sharma, 30 Dec '12 02:23 pm
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (6)

1.

MMS is not a controlled PM. Whether remote or direct. He is the same MMS who as the FM in 1991 Narsimha Rao govt had the courage to suggest the PM to throw Nehru's Economic policies out of the window. Narsimha Rao, a true Congressman (and loyal to Nehru, Indira and Rajiv) was hesitant in doing so. But ultimately MMS convinced him and what happened thereafter to India on the economic front and its overall progress is known to you and all.
Anyway another thing you must be knowing that in a Parliamentary Democracy, PM is answerable to the Party Chief. PM of UK cannot override the policy of the party, which the Party Chief enforces.
Similarly here too. MMS and Sonia are not dictators and consult each other on matters of govt. What's wrong in that?? Does that make PM a remote control or a puppet!? Just because the magazine of UK labels him as a puppet, our people of the opposition are very happy.
What actually you would like MMS to do as PM? Go against the Party and its chief?!! He shou ...more
Answered by QueSera Sera, 30 Dec '12 02:55 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

Bilkul theek.....aur remote ka PM CHANNEL wala button bhi kharab .......so system totally OUT OF CONTROL :))
Answered by chitrasahgal, 30 Dec '12 02:51 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Sayad system thoda btr hota ":(
Answered by Giaa, 30 Dec '12 02:28 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

He could have been an honest implementor
Answered by anil garg, 01 Jan '13 01:36 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
5.

He would have forced to work only for saving his 'kursi'.
With Sonia's support he is saved from that torture.
Answered by Prakash Chandra, 31 Dec '12 09:21 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
6.

MMS representing UPA and particularly Congress Party.

So naturally he has to act as per the decision of Congi Head.
Answered by anantharaman, 30 Dec '12 07:02 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (0)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining