Using your phone's internet browser
go to:  qna.rediff.com
Click and drag this link to
the Home icon in your browser.
Q.

"....................In these circumstances, we have to hold that the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011 is held to be unconstitutional and void since it is without having assent from the President of India"............( the Hon'ble Division Bench of Kolkata observed this).............Does this end the TMC govt's gimmickry and would they really work for striking a workable solution to Singur? Or there is no need for it as they have already grabbed power by the drama they staged at Singur?

Tags: india, kolkata, money
Asked by soumyen sarkar, 24 Jun '12 10:15 am
  Invite a friend  |  
  Save  |  
 Earn 10 points for answering
Answer this question  Earn 10 points for answering    
4000 characters remaining  
  
    
Keep me signed inNew User? Sign up

Answers (4)

1.

To keep all that alive till parliamentary election,if not beyond.
Answered by vishwabandhubajpai, 24 Jun '12 10:34 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (2)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
2.

WB govt will go for appeal and this case will not be solved till next Parliamentary elections
So that Politicians can mint their Seats there
Then all will forget and wont care about people of Singur
Answered by hitler, 24 Jun '12 10:20 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (2)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
3.

Its decided by the court
Answered by sameer, 27 Jun '12 12:21 pm

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received
4.

This is a decision of the court, as they see the written word in the law book and interpret it, upholding the word.
A good and conscientious judge would give it closer look and a deeper thought and sail beyond the word towards the spirit of the Law. Which way will the farmers benefit. Which way the politicians (Mamta) will benefit.
Definitely a conscientious judge would be more inclined towards the people i.e. the farmers of Singur and not the politicians.
Let us wait for the HC judgement ... and hopefully there is a conscientious judge sitting there when the case comes up for hearing.
Answered by QueSera Sera, 24 Jun '12 11:00 am

 
  
Report abuse
Useful
 (1)
Not Useful
 (0)
Your vote on this answer has already been received

Ask a Question

Get answers from the community

600 characters remaining

Related Answer

Q.
A

Hopeutwo thousand and fourteenVital to Happiness ', A recently promoted concept dubbed positive psychology holds that optimism, cultivated by positive..more

Answered by Mickey